In een tijd van mediaconcentratie, embedded journalism en politieke spin probeert 'Geopolitiek in perspectief' met beknopte teksten een onafhankelijk beeld te schetsen van de veranderende machtsverhoudingen in de wereld en de gebieden waar de strijd om de macht zich manifesteert. De blog, die open staat voor bijdragen van gastauteurs, besteedt speciale aandacht aan brandhaard Midden-Oosten en de bijzondere relatie Israël-VS.
A
new film by Emmy and Bafta award winning director John Pilger In
Cinemas 5th December 2016 Satellite Q&A with John Pilger from
Picturehouse Central
*****
Another
shadow looms over all of us. This film, The
Coming War on China,
is a warning that nuclear war is not only imaginable, but a
‘contingency’, says the Pentagon. The greatest build-up of Nato
military forces since the Second World War is under way on the
western borders of Russia. On the other side of the world, the rise
of China as the world’s second economic power is viewed in
Washington as another ‘threat’ to American dominance.
To
counter this, in 2011, President Obama announced a ‘pivot to Asia’,
which meant that almost two-thirds of all US naval forces would be
transferred to Asia and the Pacific, their weapons aimed at China.
Today, some 400 American military bases encircle China with missiles,
bombers, warships and nuclear weapons. They form an arc from
Australia north through the Pacific to Japan, Korea and across
Eurasia to Afghanistan and India. It is, says one US strategist, ‘the
perfect noose’.
In
secrecy, the biggest single American-run air-sea military exercise in
recent years – known as Talisman Sabre – has rehearsed an Air-Sea
Battle Plan, blocking sea lanes in the Straits of Malacca, cutting
off China’s access to oil, gas and other raw materials from the
Middle East and Africa.
It
is largely this fear of an economic blockade that has seen China
building airstrips on disputed islands and reefs in the South China
Sea. Last year, Chinese nuclear forces were reportedly upgraded from
low to high alert.
This
is not news, or it is news distorted or buried. Instead, there is a
familiar drumbeat identifying a new enemy: a restoration of the
psychology of fear that embedded public consciousness for most of the
20th century. The aim of The
Coming War on China
is to help break the silence. As the centenaries of the First World
War presently remind us, horrific conflict can begin all too easily.
The difference today is nuclear.
This
is my 60th film, the majority for ITV and including those made for
the cinema. Filmed on five potential frontlines across Asia and the
Pacific during almost two years, the story is told in chapters that
connect a secret and ‘forgotten’ past to the rapacious actions of
great power today and to an inspiring popular resistance, of which
little is known in the West.
Chapter
one, ‘The secret of the Marshall Islands’, describes a secret
programme – Project 4.1 – that turned these Pacific islanders
into guinea pigs for the development of nuclear weapons. Once known
as the Last Paradise, the Marshalls and their indigenous people were
subjected to the equivalent of a Hiroshima bomb exploded every day
for twelve years.
Of
all the places of upheaval I have reported from, I have not
experienced anything quite like Bikini atoll. In the emerald lagoon
where the US exploded a hydrogen bomb called Bravo in 1954, there is
a vast black hole, a void in which an entire island was vaporised.
Bikini’s people have never returned. The food is unsafe to eat and
the water unsafe to drink. There are no birds and no natural sounds.
Our shoes registered ‘leave now’ on a Geiger counter. The US
Department of Energy comes regularly to measure its mutations; there
is a radioactive market garden and palms planted in surreal grid
formation. The experiment never ends.
“We
were screaming,” Betty Edmond told me. “I tried to hide behind my
parents.” Lemoyo Abon said, “We thought it must be another war or
the end of the world.” These women, and others we filmed, were
children on the nearby island of Rongelap when Bravo irradiated them.
Described in long-forgotten archive footage as ‘amenable savages’,
most of the survivors have had thyroid and other cancers and have
received little compensation.
Today,
they live in the shadow of the Ronald Reagan Missile Test Site, a
huge and secretive US base on the largest island, Kwajalein, where
they are again subjected to the testing of weapons of mass
destruction. Here, the US Air Force fires missiles into the lagoon at
a cost of $100 million a shot. A missile test is announced with a few
sentences in the Marshall
Islands Journal,
if it all; then the sky lights up and people fall ill,
‘mysteriously’. Many of the fish are unsafe to eat.
Like
a tableau of expatriate suburbia, the base’s golf course is watered
by dispossessed islanders who are ferried to work from their slums
across the bay, and back again, at dusk. The base commands the
Pacific all the way to Asia and was built, says official archive
film, ‘to protect America from communist China’.
Crossing
the Pacific, I arrived in Shanghai for the first time in more than a
generation. Then, Mao Zedong had recently died, and the cities seemed
dark places, in which foreboding and expectation competed. Within a
few years, Deng Xiopeng, the ‘man who changed China’, was the
‘paramount leader’. Nothing prepared me for the astonishing
changes today.
‘I
make the joke’, says the Shanghai social scientist Eric Li in the
film, ‘In America you can change political parties, but you can’t
change the policies. In China you cannot change the party, but you
can change policies. The political changes that have taken place in
China this past 66 years have been wider and broader and greater than
probably any other major country in living memory’.
This
is one of a number of views from within China’s new and confident
political class that make a rare appearance in a western documentary.
In Western ‘media culture’, these revealing voices are generally
excluded, because they do not fit the received wisdom, a form of
censorship by omission. Like the imperial Edwardians, we in the West
still prefer to see Asia in terms of its usefulness or hostility to
us,
or its failings by our standards, which we promote as enlightened.
The
Coming War on China
is about the imposition of this sense of superiority and its reckless
power.
Using
some remarkable archive footage, the film touches on the American
cult of ‘exceptionalism’ that influences America’s view of
humanity and ignites its wars. Since 9/11, the US has spent $5
trillion on aggressive wars, according to a study by Brown
University. The current flight of 12 million refugees from at least
four countries is one consequence.
Andrew
Krepinevich, a former Pentagon war planner and the influential author
of war games against China, wants to ‘punish’ China for extending
its defences to the South China Sea. He advocates seeding the ocean
with sea mines, sending in special forces and enforcing a naval
blockade. ‘Our first president, George Washington, said if you want
peace, prepare for war.’ This speaks for a view dominant in
political Washington.
The
Japanese island of Okinawa has 32 US military installations, from
which Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq were attacked. The
principal target now is China. There are military aircraft constantly
in the sky, sometimes crashing into homes and schools. A hugely
popular Okinawan movement against this repressive occupation is an
extraordinary expression of how ordinary people can peacefully take
on a military giant, and begin to win (by electing Japan’s first
anti-base governor). One of their leaders is Fumiko Shimabukuro, aged
87, herself a survivor of the world war and perhaps the most
resilient human being I have filmed.
Lying
at the southern tip of Korea is Jeju Island, where a proxy US base
has been recently completed. Nuclear submarines will dock here, along
with the latest Aegis missile destroyers, less than 400 miles across
the horizon from Shanghai. A people’s resistance has been an
everyday presence in the villages around this base for almost a
decade. They are indefatigable; priests block the gates by staging a
twice-daily mass, backed by people from all over Asia and the world.
It is these voices that make the lessons of Hiroshima and Bikini more
urgent than ever. ‘We offer a choice,’ says Fukimo, ‘Silence or
life’.
The
movie started with the Bikini islands, which is a foreign island FAR
from the US mainland annexed by the States for military and human
laboratory purposes. China is indeed making a move on the disputed
area of the South China Sea. While I am not defending the absurdity
of this action, it is hypocritical of the US to criticize China while
itself is spreading its military influence all over the world for
it's economical and political purposes. The movie is rather unbiased
because it also exposes the social inequality of China as a result of
the economic reforms. Both countries have their problems, but this
movie gives an insight to the viewers for the reasons we wouldn't see
from the western media: Being demonized by the western mainstream
propaganda, China has no choice but to react to the suppression of
the States or it will meet the same fate as the Bikini islands or the
Okinawa island.
The
US government has been conducting covert operations since WW I. And
probably many other nations do that same thing. The world is sadly so
indoctrinated with false information and the media and the school
systems are so controlled that the truth does not reach the people.
Therefor I am glad John Pilger made this film and showed not only
evidence of those covert actions by the US government but also the
heroic and relentless effort that other so called ordinary people
make to expose and oppose these actions. This movie is made in deep
honor of all those who have been railroaded And even killed by these
actions of a nation that has grown to have become the largest
psychotic, delusional, megalomaniacal force in this world. Sadly
again many of its inhabitants as well as people from other nations
are indoctrinated because of false information and lack of true
information and will hold on to that this film as well as many other
proof belongs in the category of conspiracy theories. The only thing
someone has to do to get to the truth is rid oneself of all
prejudices and look at the information with an open mind. Take that
challenge and watch this movie and see for yourself. Only the truth
will set you free.
Seasoned
journalist John Pilger casts a light on the amount of US Naval Bases
situated around China and the amount of warships pointing in their
direction, and the globally catastrophic consequences this hostility
could create. He charts the shameful, untold history of the US army's
activities on the Marshall Islands in the South Pacific, where they
were lied to about chemical testing and the terrible consequences
it's had years later, as well as revealing how General Mao may not
have been the monster the imperialist west made him out to be.
China
is certainly the main contender looking to take it's shot at being
top boy on the world stage, from trade to military might, but it
seems the almighty US of A doesn't want to go down without a fight,
and, knowing its enemy, is aggressively trying to keep it in its
place. At least that's the picture that director John Pilger is
trying to portray, and although he offers alternative viewpoints to
speak their mind, it's clear throughout which country he thinks is
most to blame for this feud. At any rate, he's certainly produced
something that is a contrary assault on the western media's
presentation of Chinese life under a 'communist' regime.
Pilger
highlights what could only be described as one of the US's dirty
little secrets, questionable testing on minuscule little islands
tucked out of sight off the coast of China, where untold damage was
inflicted in pursuit of a rich, powerful countries aggressive
expansion. Not being familiar with any of his work before, it's hard
to know if any political affiliation is swaying his views, but he's
certainly created a well researched and eye opening documentary that
just about manages to excuse the just under two hour running
time.
An absorbing and, ultimately, chilling account of
what may be to come.
Geopolitiek in perspectief, dat 15 maart 2010 van start ging, is geen nieuwsblog, maar geeft achtergronden, analyse en commentaar op het wereldgebeuren. Sommige artikelen vertrekken van minder bekende maar bewezen historische gegevens en zijn daarom van blijvende waarde. Deze zijn voorzien van het label "documentaire". De documentaire bijdragen van Egbert Talens kregen bovendien een eigen label.
Reacties zijn welkom, mits voorzien van authentieke personalia en maximaal 100 woorden groot. De webmaster modereert en behoudt zich het recht voor reacties zonder opgaaf van redenen te weigeren. Reacties met toegevoegde waarde worden geplaatst.
Not a newsblog, Geopolitiek in perspectief, which was launched 15 March 2010, provides background, analysis and comment on world affairs. Some articles are based on less well known but proven historic facts and are therefore of permanent value. These posts are provided with the label "documentaire". Egbert Talens’ documentary contributions were additionally allocated an own label.
Comments of maximum 100 words are welcome if posted with authentic personal details. The webmaster moderates and reserves the right to reject posts at this discretion. Reactions with added value will be published.
Non-Dutch readers
The mission statement mentioned under the blog title reads:
"In an age of media concentration, embedded journalism and political spin, Geopolitiek in perspectiefprovides concise texts designed to paint an independent picture of the changing balance of power in the world and the areas where the struggle for power occurs. The blog, which is open to contributions from guest authors, is particularly focused on the Middle East conflicts and the Israel-US special relationship."
Het meedogenloze optreden tegen opstandelingen en gewapende rebellen in Syrië heeft naar schatting tweeduizend mensen het leven gekos...
Pageviews
Palestine
For more than seventy years, daily life for Palestinian Arabs has been about the struggle to take back their land, and their destiny, from Israel.
What’s the real plan with Iran?
The Middle East has always been a sandpit for military powers to fight their proxy wars. The latest country to be threatened to have Western democracy visited upon it is Iran.
But after decades of casual violence and conflict, Western interests are now no longer able to topple regimes with impunity, and then exploit their natural resources – and citizens in the West will no longer tolerate deathly Middle Eastern foreign policy.
So are we at a turning point?
Will the presence of other actors in the region now change the balance of international power and perhaps begin a new chapter of peace and economic progress?
Host Ross Ashcroft is joined by the journalist and Middle East based commentator Sharmine Narwani to discuss how Iran and the Middle East is reshaping the world order.
Israel and Palestine won’t get a two-state solution under Donald Trump
But they may get something better
The greatest guarantor of a society’s stability, prosperity, and sovereignty is its ability to provide all those under its rule with a genuine sense of dignity and equality. Instead of erasing national, cultural, or religious differences, Israel needs to find an intelligent way to forge a shared future. This future nation would likely need to be transformed into a binational state with significant degrees of autonomy for its diverse citizenry collectively, and robust rights for the individual. Haroon Moghul, December 21, 2016
Bush Military Official: The Empire's Ship is Sinking
Mehdi Hasan calls out EU leaders for turning their back on the thousands fleeing conflict
“I wish to resign and cease considering myself a Jew.”
…In fact, our relation to those who are second-class citizens of Israel is inextricably bound up with our relation to those who live in immense distress at the bottom of the chain of the Zionist rescue operation. That oppressed population, which has lived under the occupation for close to 50 years, deprived of political and civil rights, on land that the “state of the Jews” considers its own, remains abandoned and ignored by international politics. I recognise today that my dream of an end to the occupation and the creation of a confederation between two republics, Israeli and Palestinian, was a chimera that underestimated the balance of forces between the two parties.
Increasingly it appears to be already too late; all seems already lost, and any serious approach to a political solution is deadlocked. Israel has grown used to this, and is unable to rid itself of its colonial domination over another people. The world outside, unfortunately, does not do what is needed either. Its remorse and bad conscience prevent it from convincing Israel to withdraw to the 1948 frontiers. Nor is Israel ready to annex the occupied territories officially, as it would then have to grant equal citizenship to the occupied population and, by that fact alone, transform itself into a binational state. It’s rather like the mythological serpent that swallowed too big a victim, but prefers to choke rather than to abandon it…
Shlomo Sand, professor of history at Tel Aviv University
Our wretched Jewish state
In the Jewish state, there is no remnant of the biblical injunction to treat the minority or the stranger with justice. There are no more Jews left who marched with Martin Luther King or who sat in jail with Nelson Mandela. The Jewish state, which Israel insists the Palestinians recognize, must first recognize itself. At the end of the day, at the end of a terrible week, it seems that a Jewish state means a racist, nationalistic state, meant for Jews only. Gideon Levy, 6 July 2014
Chomsky on US global hegemony in decline
The US remains a world empire and, by your account, operates under the "Mafia principle," meaning that the godfather does not tolerate "successful defiance." Is the American empire in decline, and, if so, does it pose yet a greater threat to global peace and security?
US global hegemony reached a historically unparalleled peak in 1945, and has been declining steadily since, though it still remains very great and though power is becoming more diversified, there is no single competitor in sight. The traditional Mafia principle is constantly invoked, but ability to implement it is more constrained. The threat to peace and security is very real. To take just one example, President Obama's drone campaign is by far the most vast and destructive terrorist operation now under way. The US and its Israeli client violate international law with complete impunity, for example, by threats to attack Iran ("all options are open") in violation of core principles of the UN Charter. The most recent US Nuclear Posture Review (2010), is more aggressive in tone than its predecessors, a warning not to be ignored. Concentration of power rather generally poses dangers, in this domain as well. Noam Chomsky, interviewed by C.J. Polychroniou and Anastasia Giamali
Hoe Israel reageert op buitenlands protest
De video toont hoe kolonel Eisner zaterdag op brute wijze een internationale groep betogers tegen de grond slaat die bij Jericho aan een pro-Palestina fietstocht door de Jordaanvallei wilden beginnen. Ook andere militairen treden gewelddadig op tegen de fietsers. Enkele activisten belandden in het ziekenhuis en een veertigtal gearresteerd. De soldaten maakten het de groep onmogelijk om aan hun tocht te beginnen. Het incident raakte bekend nadat de video op YouTube verscheen. Premier Netanyahu haastte zich om het geweld tegen de activisten te veroordelen. En Joods Actueel laat weten dat het incident “zeer uitzonderlijk” is. “Soldaten en officieren die op de Westelijke Jordaanoever optreden zijn getraind om uiterst terughoudend te reageren op provocaties.” 17/4/2012
Must read: “A People's History of the United States”
Two versions of this great work by the late American historian and political scientist Howard Zinn are online: a full version and a summary. Audio and video material is also available. For full details, please refer to the article 'Must read: "A People's History of the United States"' of October 8, 2010.
De auteur doet er alles aan om ervoor te zorgen dat de informatie op Geopolitiek in perspectief actueel en juist is, maar kan niet garanderen dat zulks steeds 100% het geval is. Hij aanvaardt dan ook geen verantwoordelijkheid voor onjuistheden, onnauwkeurigheden of omissies. Hij behoudt zich het recht voor om tussentijds wijzigingen in de artikelen aan te brengen, of deze te verwijderen. De artikelen op deze blog mogen worden overgenomen, mits integraal, in ongewijzigde vorm en met vermelding van "bron: Geopolitiek in perspectief", incl. lange url (http://geopolitiek-in-perspectief.blogspot.com/). Tegen inbreuken wordt opgetreden.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten